workstyle

“Living in and out of a big fat suitcase”

Having just completed an overhaul of all my analog (physical) production files, I’m ready to take off again. I don’t know when I’m coming back to SF. But not before March. I decided I don’t need to keep copies of all my old scripts. It drastically reduced the size of everything, and made me feel better about leaving, somehow, having the files in better order.

And I’m taking the DVDs I have to copy tomorrow, so I can have copies with me – in case anyone needs to see them – and copies on file here.

Ready as I’ll ever be.

Ali and Mere and LaCona and I read in the park today, and tonight I’m at 2319 for dinner. Tomorrow I have several meetings at Stanford. Tuesday – fly to Indianapolis.

Standard
v1rtual th3at3r

…Binary solo!

I don’t know what to title this post. Virtual performance? My life finally getting weirder than my brain?

So, Kristel and I are going to “meet up” tomorrow on Second Life and go roaming around the “world.” It’s just a virtual reality system – but I’m interested in looking at what its possibilities might be for rehearsal, performance, even for having theater people have meetings on it. I wonder if you could direct a play on it. Cast it, everything. That would be so very weird. She says there’s a fairly good system of controlling motions.

I mean, is this the environment in which to do FLATLAND – the virtual environment? What if the actors performing it were wearing motion-capture suits and the performance was also being played live on Second Life? Or…I need to talk to Deb about this, the woman I met at the GOLDA opening who was involved in motion-capture choreography somehow. So, so weird.

Standard
a propos of nothing, space, workstyle

Meyer? I Hardly Even…

I’m writing this from the second floor of Meyer Library at Stanford – I have some meetings today on campus. It’s nice to be here, and I find myself being much happier and productive working in a library. I think I’ve been trying to spend too much time working from home. I should set some kind of rule that I don’t turn on the computer until I leave the house.

Meyer is a monolithic cube that’s at the center of everything, composed of stacked computer labs and libraries. It looks like it was deposited on campus by the Borg. The bottom floor stays open 24 hours, and I used to operate exclusively out of there. You’d see people biking by through the enormous glass walls – people would walk through on their way to class – you could write your paper all night and get coffee in the morning at MoonBeans, or go outside and sit by the fountain in moments of confusion.

It was my social and academic hub, my office, my command center. It was my locker, my studio, my dorm room. I slept there at least ten nights out of every year. I had trouble connecting to a lot of the (see above, monolithic) physical environment at Stanford, but Meyer saved me. I wrote poems on the second floor and papers on the first. In fact, I wrote the entire adaptation of FAUST (in longhand, for some reason) on the first floor overnight in freshman year. Also spent a large amount of time in the video labs upstairs when I worked with the Film Society. I had my first (and only) Stanford bike stolen from outside Meyer, too.

I did finish my thesis upstairs at Tressider, however. I don’t remember why. I think it was probably the proximity of the parking lot. Ah, and the printers.

Apparently Meyer is slated for demolition in 5 years. I do hope they’ll replace it with some other equivalent 24-hour cluster right next to the coffee shop. This building got me through school.

Stanford felt, at first, like such an isolating campus, from the vast distance between everything, to the way the place was obviously laid out for golf-carts and cars, to the way people would whiz by on their bikes, preventing you from having conversations on the way to class or meeting strangers. When I lost my bike, and sort of found Meyer at the same time, I began to understand I was only going to appreciate the campus on foot. Meyer was at the center. You could sit there, or around there, and meet and see people in a natural way. It felt the way that I had always hoped that going to college would. It felt connected.

And I started meeting a Stanford subculture of people who had also rejected the Bike – and taking poetry classes – and hanging out at EBF. I don’t know if I would have made any of these transitions if not for this building, and the architecture which gave me a sense of place and community. When I was lost, I could go here, and pretend that I knew what I was doing.

I feel about Meyer the way I feel when I walk into a theater. It’s nothing but a box on the outside, but on the inside there are high ceilings, full of light, and people creating interesting work. It feels wholeheartedly devoted to academia and the intellectual life in a way not many environments on campus do. I never used the Silent Study much, but I appreciated that it was in the building.

RIP, Meyer. We hardly…well, actually, we knew you quite well.

I suppose if it’s going to be torn down, it would be a good time to start asking people if we can do a site-specific play here before it is.

Standard
LA theater

Return of the Evidence Room

Or at least of the company. I’m on the mailing list for this iconic LA theater company that’s been silent for a year after losing their space, or after the space became Bootleg – and they’ve announced a new co-production with Unknown Theater, Martin Crimp’s ATTEMPTS ON HER LIFE, for November. It’ll be really interesting to see if they retain their character in a different space – the company was so specific to that location – but, according to this, Bart and Chris, the two artistic directors, appreciate one another’s work already. I wish I could see this.

(I just realized I’ve gotten to this information very late – the email popped up in my inbox yesterday, but it’s dated Sept. 24.)

Standard
books

Three’s Company

I’ve been reading SHADOWS ON THE HUDSON, by Isaac Bashevis Singer, and have realized that many of his books, not just MAGICIAN OF LUBLIN, are about a man caught between his obligations to three different women. He makes it seem like the paranoia and despair in the post-WWII Jewish community, and the shrinking world (because of the vast numbers killed off) made this commonplace. As if there weren’t enough men to go around. These men are running around caught between their dead wives (who often turn up living), their living wives, and their mistresses. I picked up a third novel of his to test this, and it was ALSO about a man with three women.

Standard