the chorus

Dear World,

You,
if you are a musician, an actor, or a singer,
in Baltimore, Maryland,
or like speaking poetry,
are invited to an
extremely informal
free-and-open-to-the-planet
Choral Speaking workshop: exploring the speaking of Greek choruses, and other similar poetic texts. With live, improvised music,
with the possibility of forming an eventual working group
to continue exploring this stuff,
but with no obligation to do so.

Come and say some words, and play some music. The word “Grotowski” will be mentioned.

Saturday at 1 PM
3033 Guilford Avenue
Contact: Dara Weinberg, daraweinbergATgmail.com.

PS. Marsupials? Really?

Standard
Baltimore, the chorus

many are the monsters

Yesterday I taught a chorus workshop in the home of a professor here in Baltimore, to two faculty and four students. We worked on a passage from Judith Molina’s translation of Brecht’s adaptation of ANTIGONE. There was quiche. It was good. Things observed:

– Brecht completely rewriting choruses (Many are the wonders, but none more wonderful than man; Love undefeated in the fight) by simply changing the thesis statement (Many are the monsters, none more monstrous than man; Lust, not love…etc.)

– Why should the members of the chorus have the same point of view, or objective, even when they are all reciting a speech with a unified objective? They don’t have to. They can each have a different approach to it. Complexity = good.

– It is always worth it to get off book, no matter how long it takes, for the text exercises.

I then went to the Towson mall with one of my friends here, and bought a watch. Then I couldn’t use my eyes any more, so I got nothing done. And today I have to catch up on work. I’ve been sick a lot lately – five days of strep throat, several days of not being able to use one of my eyes.

Standard
a propos of nothing, the chorus, writing

in case you couldn’t tell

it is difficult to blog about the program. That’s why I haven’t been doing it. You would think that writing about writing would be a natural extension of writing. It is not. For me. Doesn’t work. One precludes the other.

So.

You would also think that I could write about the program itself, and that might be something in which people would be interested. Right? But every time I begin to do it, I feel as if putting anything up here at all violates the trust of the people I’m here with. Even the most boring activities. If I were, for example, to say “We had seminar today” (which we didn’t) I don’t at all know that my friends here would want others to know that. Writers = private people. Even I find myself becoming more introverted with each day here.

So I guess you shouldn’t expect me to say much for…what? Two years?

I could say that I like it here. Every time people ask me how the program’s going, I say, “It’s wonderful, I’m very lucky to be here.” Which is true. And when they ask how the people are, I say, “They are amazing. I love them.” Also true. When they ask me how the writing is going, I say, “I am questioning everything.” And that last, so help me, is the truest of the three.

I could also say this: I get to talk to a professor and students on Saturday about choruses, with regards to their performance of a Greek play, which should be fun. This is my third chorus outreach-related activity in four months in B-more.

I also think I might be able to make some general observations on what it is like to be a graduate student. General observations on Baltimore are going to be limited, because while school is in session, I almost never leave the Homewood campus bubble.

I’m going to try, though, because I need to keep writing here.

Standard
the chorus

how about this?

Nevertheless, the ship in a storm,
Foundering and powerless,
Can save itself –
It can dump its cargo
As a tithe,
An offering.
There is hope.

and also:

That first vision of yours was common knowledge.
What you see now is pitch darkness.

– Chorus in T-Hughes’s AGAMMEMNON. I like this version better than I expected to, although his line breaks are often completely unperformable. But apart from that, the register of the language is good.

Standard
the chorus

What about this?

Two choruses, both alike in quality and number, one to focus exclusively on movement, the other on text, for a period of time until which they have decided they have perfected things sufficiently to move forward – and then rather than trying to train them my self on what they did not have, they would train each other, in an improvisation.

Yes.

Standard
the chorus, writing

in brevitas,

Concluded the Single Carrot Stones process on Sunday. That was great – I’ll get to go back and give them designer-run notes in a bit.

The program starts tomorrow. I have spent more time in the library than is reasonable or prudent in the last few weeks, in preparation for something for which you can’t prepare. I am going to iron some shirts, and then I’ll be as ready as I’ll ever be.

Standard
the chorus

and the stones, stones, stones, stones, stones, stones, stones

Another good rehearsal last night at Single Carrot. I had an hour alone with the Stones before we started incorporating them into scenes with other characters. We found some great physical actions, like knocking into each other to roll each other over, that were very Stone-like. This chorus has a lot of humor.

The movement style we found worked well in the scenes. B had also found some little rolling seats, like mini skateboards, so they could move around but still be low to the ground. I want one for myself.

In the back room, some other actors from the same company were developing a Poe piece, and we kept distantly hearing the word “bells.”

Standard
the chorus

who wants to read a jargon-heavy post?

And we’re back. Last night, I held a chorus workshop at a small theater in Baltimore – my first such since the LYSISTRATA workshops at Q School last November. I never realize how much I miss it until I am actually doing it.

This theater, Single Carrot, is doing a production of Sarah Ruhl’s EURYDICE – a play which contains a chorus of Stones, and which has, in my opinion, the most frequently performed and also the most-often-badly-performed chorus of any contemporary play. I get very frustrated with interpretations of the Stones. I mentioned this to the artistic director of SC, who I met in Poland, and he was like, “Why don’t you come in and do a workshop?”

Er…why don’t I?

Many elements were successfully incorporated, including the presence of a living playwright/poet and some of his text, live drums and guitar from actor/ensemble members, learning text orally, both vocal and physical chorus improv, etc. This was also my first such WS with an ensemble who is used to working together all the time.

I walked the group through a strong vocal unison, using text from Sarah Ruhl’s STONES. I built the unison in the easiest way I know, assigning one line to each person, and gradually giving them the opportunity to join on each other’s text. We had a musical intro and central break, and added emotional underscoring music throughout when they were ready.

We then merged into the exercise where each person presents their individual chorus and I add more people to it. This is all fun, easy, and guaranteed to be successful. It comes from the “gestaffelt” staggered stuff I did with the Germans, I think. One at a time: A, A+B, A+B+C – generative – stacking – it’s both interesting and easily applicable.

Simple as that work is, I am always pleased with it, especially the part where I watch individual actors become more “choral,” or exaggerated, in the presence of music or of other chorus members.

But then, in the 3rd hour of the WS, both the participants and the playwright were eager to see some movement improvisation. I’d been waving around the “flock of birds” terms too much, and they wanted to see it. Me and my big mouth.

First, to get everyone up on stage and use all the individual choruses, I brought up the remaining 5 people and asked them to use their choruses all together, all at once. That was very nice, and they quickly adjusted to the idea of “I’m losing the text,” and self-corrected. Some beautiful simultaneity resulted here. I would have been happy to keep jamming on vocal overlap all evening, and stay away from movement.

But everyone wants the flock of birds, so I had to produce it. Also, having waited to the end of the WS, energy was low, for the work that requires the highest energy.

So, with tired actors and without experienced musicians, I tried to fast-forward them through the physical imitation exercises that I haven’t touched in over a year. This was tough, and I made it tougher by also trying to incorporate text without a leader, teaching long (new) passages orally, and then by trying to make them guess that the missing element in their work was imitation, instead of just telling them.

We took a much-needed break, and then the poet/playwright helped me immensely. I was kind of holding back from telling the actors what to do in terms of imitation. He jumped in, not having ever done this before, and kind of intuited the appropriate imitating directions. It was fascinating to see another director developing, on the fly, the kind of techniques that it has taken me ten years of banging my head into a wall to evolve.

He used different language than what I would have, too. He referred to imitative movement as “amplification” and “reverb” and used the metaphor of a Ouija board to great effect.

It was really cool to see him directing the actors. I was pleased that I was able to let someone jump into “my” process easily, and without much ego on my side. I was fine with sharing it. I jumped back in when I felt like we were going off the rails and like my experience could be useful, but I had no attachment to the idea of running the work.

I did this successfully once with JW in Portland, I think, but she is a trusted friend. It’s nice to see that I can do it consistently. Handing over a workshop in mid-process to another leader, someone who is essentially a stranger to me, is not something I could have done at seventeen, any more than I could have given up my Legos at seven.

Hooray for detachment.

Some things I am proud of myself for are:
– opening up input to other leaders
– taking ideas from the group
– allowing the energy of the group to shape the workshop, even when I knew it was leading away from techniques that we could succeed at easily and quickly
– allowing the possibility of failure to exist
– being mindful of the exhaustion level of the group, and safety
– allowing failure, but also ending the WS early at a point of success
– not yelling over the group – allowing their bubbly energy to burn out and them to come back to silence when they were ready to work.
– only giving one direction at a time (I got worse at this as I went on. Could still work on it.)
– not ending improvs too early
– admitting when I was confused or didn’t know what to do next

Some things I need to work on, or rethink, are:
– my use of the direction “Do it again, but make it better,” or “Do it again, but make it suck less.” Although I think this is a valid direction to give, there’s no reason I have to sound like a drill sergeant. What’s wrong with “Do it again, but find one thing to improve or change?”
– My use of the direction “Stop.” I need to remember to say “Hold” instead, or “Pause,” or “Relax.” The word “Stop!” makes it seem like a panic moment.
– my defeatist attitude. 2/3 of the way through, I started getting so sad that it would end, that I stopped caring. M, the poet/playwright, had to shake me out of that complacency.
– my attitude towards whether a new group of actors needs to experience techniques that I have seen before. Just because I have seen them doesn’t mean they can’t gain something new from feeling it. I need to find a way to integrate the physical improv bit into the basic workshop, even though I am less interested in it right now than I used to be. Other people need to see it. To them, it is new.
– my attitude that each new chorus WS should lead me to make a new discovery. The discovery can be in the repetition of old techniques with new people.
– my attitude that somehow a concept will be better if actors find the idea without my telling them. This is fine, for awhile, but if they don’t find something and aren’t going to, there is really no harm in my pointing them in that direction. I need to not have secrets.
– my energy level. I was exhausted and wired, all at the same time, after the WS happened. It was so intense. I went out for drinks and fish and chips with the poet/playwright, and I said to him, “I don’t know how I did this every night and all day on weekends, plus working a full-time job, for four years in a row. It’s no wonder that I spent all last year being sick.” The way I feel now, one or two chorus workshops a week, at full intensity, is all I could possibly handle. Running a full process like this, in my current (older, less Energizer Bunny) state, would require the support of a larger staff.

I mentioned to the folks in this ensemble that I was interested in forming a part-time chorus working group, perhaps something that would meet only once a week for an hour or two, and in having them audition when I was ready for that. I’m glad I put that out there. Perhaps it will happen.

Things I’ve never seen before:
– Actors mouthing words of text without speaking them to “decorate” or add to chorus passages. Lovely.
– Actors developing the “echo” concept without my introducing it
– Having a two-person chorus consist of two different characters with shared text (Romeo & Juliet)
– Having the musicians speak as integrated ensemble members
– Specifically asking to not see any leading, to not see movement being inititated (M’s idea, not mine – Ouija board…frankly, I am fine with seeing movement being initiated – but this was cool!)

Standard
quotes, the chorus

I don’t know why, I don’t know how,

but I know something’s starting right now…

– Ariel

I sent out a mass update to some friends of mine yesterday, about Poland, among other things. One of my oldest and dearest collaborators wrote back, saying, in effect, “I’m glad you’re feeling so inspired, cause I am having an inspiration deficiency.” Well, we talked, and now we have a project. I’ll say more when it is already happening.

Standard
film, the chorus

Fifty Frenchmen can’t be wrong

To elaborate more on the Menken/Ashman work in BEAUTY AND THE BEAST, one of the things I can appreciate about it now is the way that the same musical themes are used by opposing characters to express different viewpoints – within the same song. It reminds me of the medleys in West Side Story, esp. TONIGHT.

Like this, from the opening medley, BELLE:

Sung by Belle:
There goes the baker with his tray, like always
The same old bread and rolls to sell
Ev’ry morning just the same
Since the morning that we came
To this poor provincial town

Sung by townspeople:
Look there she goes that girl is strange, no question
Dazed and distracted, can’t you tell?
Never part of any crowd
‘Cause her head’s up on some cloud
No denying she’s a funny girl that Belle

Same music. Different words. It’s a really simple effect but enormously effective. And the way in which it’s effective has to do with the element of the chorus I’m always interested in – the collective nature of imitation. The way ideas, words, themes, are shared between people in a chorus environment. The way that everything gets repeated and reflected back.

Standard